Practice Value

Valuations of assets should be examined from the three valuation approaches, the Market Approach, the Income Approach, and the Asset Approach. This paper will concentrate on the Market Approach, using the Direct Market Data Method.

Practice values can be tracked statistically and the statistic with the most valid correlation is the Price/Revenues (P/R) percentage. This is more reliable than Price/Net Income data because expenses can vary widely by including elective and creative expenses and are likely to be not treated universally the same. The source of the Revenue denominator varies with different appraisers, but the statistic we use is the most current year end revenues or annualizing revenues of at least six months experience since the previous period ending date. Consider the following data.

This analysis consists of 271 practice sales. In this data progression, the average P/R ratio is 63%. The median for the population is 66% which indicates that ratios in the upper half of the population have incomes that are larger in proportion to the ratios in the lower half of the population.

The other interesting finding is that the mean practice gross is $442,232 and the median practice gross is $369,000, indicating that the practice gross incomes in the upper half of the population are disproportionately higher than the practices in the lower half of the population.

We find that the mean P/R ratio is 63%, a very consistent finding over a period of time, and the standard deviation for the population is 12%. This shows how closely the data points are clustered, with one standard deviation, or 2/3 of the population, having P/R ratios in the range of 52% to 75%. Two standard deviations includes 95% of the population and practice P/R ratios range from 40% to 87%.

Here’s an interesting bell curve of distribution of P/V ratios.

The right skewed distribution in the above graph shows how the largest percentage P/R ratios are on the right side, explaining why the median value is higher than the mean.

Now we have learned a great deal statistically from this analysis, but what does it mean to you and your practice? Here are some key points to consider.

- The average P/R ratio is 63%
- That statistic is interesting but useless information.
- Out of 271 practices, only 7 practices, or 2.5% sold at the average P/R ratio.
- If a dentist assumed his practice was worth the average P/R ratio, his chances of being wrong are 97.5%

There is a large continuum of P/R ratio values, from 22% to 90%, and many factors go into determining where any one practice is valued. We have examined the statistics and owners can see where the boundaries are, but to know exactly where in that 68% variation their own practice lies, a professional trained, experienced and educated dental practice valuation expert is required.

Professional valuations take into account the market factors that drive a P/V ratio for the subject practice and how they compare to other comparable practices that have sold and the transactional data is known. It is tempting for an owner to value their own practice, but there is an obvious lack of objectivity in this process. Owners frequently feel that their practice is extremely unique and much more valuable and desirable than all other practices, and this is a common finding. In over thirty years of valuing practices, I’ve yet to have an owner tell me that I have overvalued their practice (unlike the buyers who examine them). It is true that each individual’s practice is quite unique, just like everyone else’s.

Valuators also must consider the cash flow ability of the subject practice and the ability of the cash flow to support the market approach values derived.

While there may be some very flattering market approach results for a practice, there is the practical aspect of the finance-ability of the practice pricing. If lenders cannot prove how the purchaser is able to pay the practice overhead, pay the debt service, and pay themselves, they are not likely to provide financing for such a price, therefore making the purchase inaccessible to most all buyers. The Income Approach to value determines how much a purchaser can afford to pay and at the end of the day earn a commensurate net income for the work that they did, and there should also be a profit component in addition to this salary component. The Income Approach is the topic of another white paper though.

In summary, we can examine transactional data for dental practice sales and establish the boundaries of value. We can determine mean, median and standard deviation statistics, but these are more interesting than they are helpful. Practice valuations are best done by trained and experienced valuators who are objective in their approach, and most qualified about where any one practice value lies on the very large continuum of values and prepared to prove why.

**Testimonial from a Satistfied Dentist**

"I can't thank you enough for sending Alan our way. Two wonderful results have shown up: all of the staff are still at the office and I have yet to meet a patient on the street who doesn't thank me for having Dr. Allgood take over the practice. It's such a great feeling to know that those important to me, staff and patients, are being cared for in the manner in which they were accustomed. Win, win, win; for all of us.

When I talk to classmates who are contemplating retirement or selling their practice I never hear about how smoothly the transition is going. Thank you again for making ours go so seamlessly.

Terry Pampel, Foley, AL

Congratulations to the following doctors on the sale of your practice. Thank you for trusting our team with your sale.

Dr. Greg Sand

Dr. John Bellerjeau

Dr. Scott McRae

Dr. Shaun Kern

Dr. Jeff Stanfield

Dr. Joan Friedlander

Dr. Carl Klein

Dr. Mike Mahan

Dr. Betty Lee

Dr. Charles Baldone

Dr. Terry Pampel

Dr. Glenn Stanford

Dr. Robert Sims

Dr. Fredrick Miller

Dr. Winton Cowles

Dr. William Holley

Dr. Steven Lynch

Dr. Bill Finley

Dr. Gerald Burger"

Practice Value

Valuations of assets should be examined from the three valuation approaches, the Market Approach, the Income Approach, and the Asset Approach. This paper will concentrate on the Market Approach, using the Direct Market Data Method.

Practice values can be tracked statistically and the statistic with the most valid correlation is the Price/Revenues (P/R) percentage. This is more reliable than Price/Net Income data because expenses can vary widely by including elective and creative expenses and are likely to be not treated universally the same. The source of the Revenue denominator varies with different appraisers, but the statistic we use is the most current year end revenues or annualizing revenues of at least six months experience since the previous period ending date. Consider the following data.

This analysis consists of 271 practice sales. In this data progression, the average P/R ratio is 63%. The median for the population is 66% which indicates that ratios in the upper half of the population have incomes that are larger in proportion to the ratios in the lower half of the population.

The other interesting finding is that the mean practice gross is $442,232 and the median practice gross is $369,000, indicating that the practice gross incomes in the upper half of the population are disproportionately higher than the practices in the lower half of the population.

We find that the mean P/R ratio is 63%, a very consistent finding over a period of time, and the standard deviation for the population is 12%. This shows how closely the data points are clustered, with one standard deviation, or 2/3 of the population, having P/R ratios in the range of 52% to 75%. Two standard deviations includes 95% of the population and practice P/R ratios range from 40% to 87%.

Here’s an interesting bell curve of distribution of P/V ratios.

The right skewed distribution in the above graph shows how the largest percentage P/R ratios are on the right side, explaining why the median value is higher than the mean.

Now we have learned a great deal statistically from this analysis, but what does it mean to you and your practice? Here are some key points to consider.

- The average P/R ratio is 63%
- That statistic is interesting but useless information.
- Out of 271 practices, only 7 practices, or 2.5% sold at the average P/R ratio.
- If a dentist assumed his practice was worth the average P/R ratio, his chances of being wrong are 97.5%

There is a large continuum of P/R ratio values, from 22% to 90%, and many factors go into determining where any one practice is valued. We have examined the statistics and owners can see where the boundaries are, but to know exactly where in that 68% variation their own practice lies, a professional trained, experienced and educated dental practice valuation expert is required.

Professional valuations take into account the market factors that drive a P/V ratio for the subject practice and how they compare to other comparable practices that have sold and the transactional data is known. It is tempting for an owner to value their own practice, but there is an obvious lack of objectivity in this process. Owners frequently feel that their practice is extremely unique and much more valuable and desirable than all other practices, and this is a common finding. In over thirty years of valuing practices, I’ve yet to have an owner tell me that I have overvalued their practice (unlike the buyers who examine them). It is true that each individual’s practice is quite unique, just like everyone else’s.

Valuators also must consider the cash flow ability of the subject practice and the ability of the cash flow to support the market approach values derived.

While there may be some very flattering market approach results for a practice, there is the practical aspect of the finance-ability of the practice pricing. If lenders cannot prove how the purchaser is able to pay the practice overhead, pay the debt service, and pay themselves, they are not likely to provide financing for such a price, therefore making the purchase inaccessible to most all buyers. The Income Approach to value determines how much a purchaser can afford to pay and at the end of the day earn a commensurate net income for the work that they did, and there should also be a profit component in addition to this salary component. The Income Approach is the topic of another white paper though.

In summary, we can examine transactional data for dental practice sales and establish the boundaries of value. We can determine mean, median and standard deviation statistics, but these are more interesting than they are helpful. Practice valuations are best done by trained and experienced valuators who are objective in their approach, and most qualified about where any one practice value lies on the very large continuum of values and prepared to prove why.

The Transitions Group, LLC

**Testimonial from a Satistfied Dentist**

"I can't thank you enough for sending Alan our way. Two wonderful results have shown up: all of the staff are still at the office and I have yet to meet a patient on the street who doesn't thank me for having Dr. Allgood take over the practice. It's such a great feeling to know that those important to me, staff and patients, are being cared for in the manner in which they were accustomed. Win, win, win; for all of us.

When I talk to classmates who are contemplating retirement or selling their practice I never hear about how smoothly the transition is going. Thank you again for making ours go so seamlessly.

Terry Pampel, Foley, AL

Congratulations to the following doctors on the sale of your practice. Thank you for trusting our team with your sale.

Dr. Greg Sand

Dr. John Bellerjeau

Dr. Scott McRae

Dr. Shaun Kern

Dr. Jeff Stanfield

Dr. Joan Friedlander

Dr. Carl Klein

Dr. Mike Mahan

Dr. Betty Lee

Dr. Charles Baldone

Dr. Terry Pampel

Dr. Glenn Stanford

Dr. Robert Sims

Dr. Fredrick Miller

Dr. Winton Cowles

Dr. William Holley

Dr. Steven Lynch

Dr. Bill Finley

Dr. Gerald Burger"